The two tubes of the rear upper A-arm.
A tube in tension and compression. Buckling governs in compression, so sizing runs against critical buckling load before it runs against yield.
No part-specific design process is documented. The Arms subsystem design process applies: 1. Take the geometry points from kinematics and the wheel loads from the load cases: CR26I front outside cornering 648.691 lbf vertical and 786.094 lbf lateral, braking 585.523 lbf vertical and 763.26 lbf longitudinal, combined 768.095 / 785.550 / 444.124 lbf. 2. Resolve loads into each member with Altair HyperWorks MotionView. 3. Size the tubes in the calculator against buckling and yield. CR26I front upper 0.375 in OD / 0.305 in ID at minimum FoS 1.946; rear upper same tube at 2.581; front lower 0.625 / 0.527 at 2.49; rear lower 0.5 / 0.402 at 2.62. 4. Analyse the spherical bearing holder with two FEA setups so the boundary conditions are cross-checked: bearing fixed with loads at the pullrod bolt and arms, then arms and pushrod bolt fixed with a remote load at bearing centre. Validate the tab stress against a hand calculation for a hole centred in a wall (calculated 18.95 ksi against 22 ksi FEA). 5. Weld in the jigging assembly, then measure the finished arm.
Cut to length, then welded or bonded to its end inserts.
AISI 4130 steel, 0.375 in OD / 0.305 in ID.
Fault Vault, CR26I: the rear right upper fore tube was cut too short two years running, once because the frame tab was welded in the wrong place and once from a cutting error, forcing the use of a modified rod end. Corrective action recorded: double check calculated arm lengths after cutting and coping, before welding.
Nothing in CrimsonStorage covers these yet.